Coutts v. Greenhow: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Coutts v. Greenhow''}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''Coutts v. Greenhow''}} | ||
[[File: | [[File:MunfordCouttsvGreenhow1814v2p363.jpg|link=Media:MunfordsReports1814V2CouttsvGreenhow.pdf|thumb|right|300px|First page of the opinion [[Media:MunfordsReports1814V2CouttsvGreenhow.pdf|''Coutts v. Greenhow'']], in [http://wm-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/01COWM_WM:EVERYTHING:01COWM_WM_ALMA21560678820003196 ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia''], by William Munford. New York: I. Riley, 1814.]] | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
[[Media:MunfordsReports1814V2CouttsvGreenhow.pdf|''Coutts v. Greenhow'']], 16 Va. (2 Munf.) 363 (1811), <ref>William Munford, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia'' (New York: I. Riley, 1814), 2:363.</ref> was a property dispute regarding whether the property should go to children born to the parties before the marriage (illegitimate children) per a marriage settlement or to a creditor to disburse debts. | [[Media:MunfordsReports1814V2CouttsvGreenhow.pdf|''Coutts v. Greenhow'']], 16 Va. (2 Munf.) 363 (1811), <ref>William Munford, ''Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia'' (New York: I. Riley, 1814), 2:363.</ref> was a property dispute regarding whether the property should go to children born to the parties before the marriage (illegitimate children) per a marriage settlement or to a creditor to disburse debts. | ||
Revision as of 18:05, 2 April 2018
Coutts v. Greenhow, 16 Va. (2 Munf.) 363 (1811), [1] was a property dispute regarding whether the property should go to children born to the parties before the marriage (illegitimate children) per a marriage settlement or to a creditor to disburse debts.
Background
Coutts owed a debt to Greenhow. To recover that debt, Greenhow attempt to foreclose property that was devised to Coutts children, who were born out of wedlock.
The Court's Decision
Chancellor Wythe decreed that the creditor should be able to foreclose the property. The Court of Appeals reversed.
See also
References
- ↑ William Munford, Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (New York: I. Riley, 1814), 2:363.