Beverley v. Rennolds: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Beverley v. Rennolds''}} ''Southall v. M'Keand'', Wythe 121 (1791),<ref>George Wythe, ''Decisions of Cases in Virginia by the High Court of Chancery,'' (R..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Beverley v. Rennolds''}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''Beverley v. Rennolds''}} | ||
'' | ''Beverley v. Rennolds'', Wythe 121 (1791),<ref>George Wythe, ''[[Decisions of Cases in Virginia by the High Court of Chancery]],'' (Richmond: Printed by Thomas Nicolson, 1795), 121.</ref> was a case discussing whether a court of equity could nullify an arbitrator's award based on a void contract. | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
Revision as of 16:07, 2 April 2014
Beverley v. Rennolds, Wythe 121 (1791),[1] was a case discussing whether a court of equity could nullify an arbitrator's award based on a void contract.
Background
The Court's Decision
References
- ↑ George Wythe, Decisions of Cases in Virginia by the High Court of Chancery, (Richmond: Printed by Thomas Nicolson, 1795), 121.