George Wythe: Early Modern Judge: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"}} | ||
"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"<ref>Wythe Holt, [http://www.law.ua.edu/pubs/lrarticles/Volume%2058/Issue%205/Holt.pdf "George Wythe: Early Modern Judge,"] ''Alabama Law Review'' 58, no. 5 (2007), 1009-1039.</ref> is a 2007 law review article written by University Research Professor Emeritus, Wythe Holt, Jr. (a descendent of Wythe's sister), for a legal history symposium in his honor. Holt considers four opinions by | "George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"<ref>Wythe Holt, [http://www.law.ua.edu/pubs/lrarticles/Volume%2058/Issue%205/Holt.pdf "George Wythe: Early Modern Judge,"] ''Alabama Law Review'' 58, no. 5 (2007), 1009-1039.</ref> is a 2007 law review article written by University Research Professor Emeritus, Wythe Holt, Jr. (a descendent of [[George Wythe|Wythe's]] sister), for a legal history symposium in his honor. Holt considers four opinions by Wythe: ''[[Commonwealth v. Caton]], Page v. Pendleton, Pleasants v. Pleasants,'' and ''Hudgins v. Wrights.'' | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 17:30, 22 February 2014
"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"[1] is a 2007 law review article written by University Research Professor Emeritus, Wythe Holt, Jr. (a descendent of Wythe's sister), for a legal history symposium in his honor. Holt considers four opinions by Wythe: Commonwealth v. Caton, Page v. Pendleton, Pleasants v. Pleasants, and Hudgins v. Wrights.
References
- ↑ Wythe Holt, "George Wythe: Early Modern Judge," Alabama Law Review 58, no. 5 (2007), 1009-1039.
External links
Read this article at the Alabama Law Review.