Fragment, May 1799: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This fragment, dated May 1799 and written in the hand of George Wythe, denies a motion to dissolve an injunction in an unnamed case. Image from [https://historical.ha.com/itm/autographs/statesmen/declaration-signer-george-wythe-autograph-endorsement-one-partial-page-removed-from-document-3-x-225-np-may-1799-in/a/626-25404.s Heritage Auctions.] | This fragment, dated May 1799 and written in the hand of George Wythe, denies a motion to dissolve an injunction in an unnamed case, leaving open the possibility that the motion may be granted upon further consideration of the accounts. Image from [https://historical.ha.com/itm/autographs/statesmen/declaration-signer-george-wythe-autograph-endorsement-one-partial-page-removed-from-document-3-x-225-np-may-1799-in/a/626-25404.s Heritage Auctions.] | ||
[[File:WytheMay1799.jpg|thumb|right|400px|]] | [[File:WytheMay1799.jpg|thumb|right|400px|]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:11, 21 August 2025
This fragment, dated May 1799 and written in the hand of George Wythe, denies a motion to dissolve an injunction in an unnamed case, leaving open the possibility that the motion may be granted upon further consideration of the accounts. Image from Heritage Auctions.
Letter Text, May 1799
Page 1
may, 1799. accounts may, by consent of defendent, be refered; and, upon report, motion to dissolve the injunction, now denied, may be repealed.