Ford v. Gardner: Difference between revisions

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Mvanwicklin (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 7: Line 7:
==Background==
==Background==
The family members of Mary Gardner brought a suit against Francis Ford. Ford claimed that Mary had written a will giving him her entire estate. The Gardner family provided several witnesses stating that the document Ford possessed was not properly executed.  
The family members of Mary Gardner brought a suit against Francis Ford. Ford claimed that Mary had written a will giving him her entire estate. The Gardner family provided several witnesses stating that the document Ford possessed was not properly executed.  
===The Court's Decision===
===The Court's Decision===
Chancellor Wythe affirmed the lower court’s decision in favor of the Gardner family. The Court of Appeals agreed.
[[George Wythe|Chancellor Wythe]] affirmed the lower court’s decision in favor of the Gardner family. The Court of Appeals agreed.
 
==See also==
==See also==
*[[Wythe's Judicial Career]]
*[[Wythe's Judicial Career]]

Latest revision as of 20:00, 4 September 2018

First page of the opinion Ford v. Gardner, in Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia: with Select Cases, Relating Chiefly to Points of Practice, Decided by the Superior Court of Chancery for the Richmond District, by William Hening and William Munford 2nd ed. Flatbush, N.Y.: I. Riley, 1809.

Ford v. Gardner, 11 Va. (1 Hen. & M.) 71 (1806),[1] was a case involving the validity of a will.

Background

The family members of Mary Gardner brought a suit against Francis Ford. Ford claimed that Mary had written a will giving him her entire estate. The Gardner family provided several witnesses stating that the document Ford possessed was not properly executed.

The Court's Decision

Chancellor Wythe affirmed the lower court’s decision in favor of the Gardner family. The Court of Appeals agreed.

See also

References

  1. William Hening and William Munford, Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia: with Select Cases, Relating Chiefly to Points of Practice, Decided by the Superior Court of Chancery for the Richmond District, 2nd ed. (Flatbush, N.Y.: I. Riley, 1809), 1:71