George Wythe: Early Modern Judge: Difference between revisions

From Wythepedia: The George Wythe Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"}}
"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"<ref>Wythe Holt, [[http://www.law.ua.edu/pubs/lrarticles/Volume%2058/Issue%205/Holt.pdf "George Wythe: Early Modern Judge,"] ''Alabama Law Review'' 58, no. 5 (2007), 1009-1039.</ref> is a 2007 law review article written by University Research Professor Emeritus, Wythe Holt, Jr. (a descendent of Wythe's sister), for a legal history symposium in his honor. Holt considers four opinions by [[George Wythe|Wythe]]: ''[[Commonwealth v. Caton]], Page v. Pendleton, Pleasants v. Pleasants,'' and ''Hudgins v. Wrights.''
"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"<ref>Wythe Holt, [http://www.law.ua.edu/pubs/lrarticles/Volume%2058/Issue%205/Holt.pdf "George Wythe: Early Modern Judge,"] ''Alabama Law Review'' 58, no. 5 (2007), 1009-1039.</ref> is a 2007 law review article written by University Research Professor Emeritus, Wythe Holt, Jr. (a descendent of [[George Wythe|Wythe's]] sister), for a legal history symposium in his honor. Holt considers four opinions by Wythe: ''[[Commonwealth v. Caton]], Page v. Pendleton, Pleasants v. Pleasants,'' and ''Hudgins v. Wrights.''


==References==
==References==
Line 7: Line 7:
==External links==
==External links==


Read this article at the [http://www.law.ua.edu/pubs/lrarticles/Volume%2058/Issue%205/Holt.pdf Alabama Law Review.]
Read this article at the [http://www.law.ua.edu/pubs/lrarticles/Volume%2058/Issue%205/Holt.pdf ''Alabama Law Review.'']


[[Category:Biographies (Articles)]]
[[Category:Biographies (Articles)]]

Latest revision as of 17:39, 22 February 2014

"George Wythe: Early Modern Judge"[1] is a 2007 law review article written by University Research Professor Emeritus, Wythe Holt, Jr. (a descendent of Wythe's sister), for a legal history symposium in his honor. Holt considers four opinions by Wythe: Commonwealth v. Caton, Page v. Pendleton, Pleasants v. Pleasants, and Hudgins v. Wrights.

References

  1. Wythe Holt, "George Wythe: Early Modern Judge," Alabama Law Review 58, no. 5 (2007), 1009-1039.

External links

Read this article at the Alabama Law Review.